sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:33:37 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Daniel Goller wrote:
> Let me just cut this out.
> How about if we started a seperate thread, asking users to support us by
> giving us info through ledger.
> 41 machines and over 40 devs with some more than one machine does not look
> like it's a widely installed tool amongst users.
> I understand it's optional. With the community being so small, we might get
> more support from users than gentoo got when they tried to collect
> statistics.
> The culprit there was it was a private project, privately hosted, not a
> gentoo hosted project, since ledger is our project, the point should never
> be an issue here.
> Question is how many users know they could help us through ledger?
> The more know, the more can decide for themselves to help us out, and in
> the long run reap the benefits by time being spent on what they use, and we
> all win.
>
> [Yes][No][Maybe] (Please check one)
>
> Daniel
It would probably be beneficial to remind users about Ledger, and ask
them to participate to improve their SMGL experience. ;) Might want to
post to the website as well about it.
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFooBpHXt9dKjv3WERCgm5AJ9KT4UJltCcvfoY+L3sq6/xFjzTpACgmQfj
6oi3c40yLdFxQnMKCPIEvdg=
=nK+7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, seth, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, seth, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Alexander Tsamutali, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, seth, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Jeremy Blosser, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Daniel Goller, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Eric Sandall, 01/08/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Jeremy Blosser, 01/09/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Arjan Bouter, 01/10/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/08/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Jeremy Blosser, 01/08/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Daniel Goller, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/08/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, S. Barret Dolph, 01/08/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Thomas Orgis, 01/07/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!, Andrew, 01/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.