sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:46:28 -0500
Eric Sandall wrote:
- From what I recall we setup anonymous votin because some gurusMy point is that it was a bad decision and if we're an accountable bunch (as we should be), we need to take a look back and reconsider it. This thread is a waste of time, but IMO it's only because original decision was wrong and we're now wasting even more time on devising complex auditing schemes were none are necessary. I wanted to stop that.
requested it (I do not recall which gurus or if they're even with us).
The point, which you seem to be missing even though several of us have
pointed it out, is that this thread is about adding auditing to our
current voting process, that's it. Also note that anonymous voting is
'safer' and has, at least in the past, been requested by our
developers with no one (with one exception) asking for it to be
changed.
I think we've already done our 'poll' through this thread. We haveIn fact, in the the following messages, two people said they don't mind open vote:
more than one for anonymous voting and one against.
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2006-February/013412.html - Jeremy Blosser/;/
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2006-February/013418.html - you.
The concern about new developers expecting closed voting that you expressed before in #013418 is I believe unwarranted because it's not common to vote secretly in FOSS projects (and nobody contested that).
I do not believe that we will be changing our voting from anonymous toThis is my last post. Thanks for reading.
public unless we have more developers who feel we need this, and if
more do, please start a /new/ thread about that so we can finish this
one.
Sergey.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Mathieu L., 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Mathieu L., 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Eric Sandall, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, David Kowis, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Eric Sandall, 02/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Mathieu L., 02/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 02/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process, Andrew, 02/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead),
Mathieu L., 02/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead),
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead), Eric Sandall, 02/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process (was: Team Lead Nominations: Project Lead),
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.