Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks
  • Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:47:39 -0500

On Aug 17, Jason Flatt [jflatt AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 August 2005 09:41 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Alex Smith wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > >> Given the nature of our distribution as being for independently-minded
> > >> people, is there room to suggest that we standardize the
> > >> herald/elder/apprentice/golem ones, and other devs can choose anything
> > >> they
> > >> want that's "in theme"? Or would that upset freenode?
> > >
> > > Probably upset them. Most distros only have one, or two types at the
> > > most. Whilst keeping this in mind - you don't get if you don't ask :)
> >
> > So they wouldn't like us having golem, apprentice, elder, wizard, and
> > guru (plus whatever replaces mage, if anything)? We'd maybe get two of
> > them?
> >
> > -sandalle
>
> If only two are allowed, then probably stick with lead and developer,
> whatever titles are finally decided on.

I'm pretty sure gentoo has at least developer, user, and bot. I'd stick
with those if we have a limit (our versions of those, anyway).

Attachment: pgpvY7lpUKStK.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page