sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: Alex Smith <alex AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Alex Smith wrote:
<snip>
Given the nature of our distribution as being for independently-minded
people, is there room to suggest that we standardize the
herald/elder/apprentice/golem ones, and other devs can choose anything
they
want that's "in theme"? Or would that upset freenode?
Probably upset them. Most distros only have one, or two types at the most.
Whilst keeping this in mind - you don't get if you don't ask :)
So they wouldn't like us having golem, apprentice, elder, wizard, and
guru (plus whatever replaces mage, if anything)? We'd maybe get two of
them?
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDA2ivHXt9dKjv3WERArNtAKC1RTqtFroPm6YO0Flnt6NvpqJKtQCeJEyB
rEmfcoF8C+/GYYI+z+LQy5U=
=VblT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Eric Sandall, 08/09/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jason Flatt, 08/09/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks, Eric Sandall, 08/10/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jason Flatt, 08/09/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/10/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Eric Sandall, 08/10/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
David Kowis, 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks, Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
David Kowis, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Alex Smith, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Eric Sandall, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jason Flatt, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks, Eric Sandall, 08/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Jason Flatt, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Eric Sandall, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Alex Smith, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Eric Sandall, 08/10/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks,
Eric Sandall, 08/09/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.