Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>]

> > I also think sourcemage/mage is kind of redundant-looking, but I don't 
> > know
> > if it's worth trying to find something else.
> 
> That is a good point. On IRC 'sorcerer' was mentioned, but that looks
> a bit silly to me (sourcemage/sorcerer). Even the variation
> 'sourcerer' looks odd. The idea was that a 'mage' is typically a
> 'generic' type of wizard, where you can have specialties and then have
> a different name (in D&D parlance you could be a Transmuter, Evoker,
> Abjurer, etc.). Perhaps 'nomad' would fit the spot better? Suggestions
> are welcome.
> 

but... but... but... /me likes mage :)

-- 
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru

http://ruskie.dtdm.org/blog/