Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:44:15 -0500

On Aug 08, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just bringing this up now that FreeNode has a new cloak setup. From
> our prior discussion[0] we wanted what appears to be the following:
> user|{wizard|mage|guru,apprentice}|golem|elder
>
> General meanings:
> * user : User's who request a cloak and have been around for a
> 'while' (say, at least 3 months)
> * elder : A Team Lead
> * wizard : Scripting-end, codes bash a lot (sorcery/ISO team)
> * guru : Spellkeeper, writes spells for breakfast and maintains
> the grimoire
> * mage : allrounder, a bit of each of them, like QA team or such
> * apprentice : New developer, not quite confident, once he/she knows
> their specialities and capabilites they re-apply for
> one of the above
> * golem : A bot
>
> So, if people would care to send me the cloaks they'd like (e.g.
> /sourcemage/guru, /sourcemage/apprentice, etc.) along with the nick
> you'd like the cloak applied to (has to be a registered nick) I'll
> send those to lilo in about a week (so that he can do them all at once
> instead of a few at a time).

Maybe it's too late, but I'd add/change a couple:

* arch : project lead

* herald : use this instead of 'user'. people wearing our cloak are at
least implicitly advocates, and these people are often
answering a lot of questions for newbies in IRC.

I also think sourcemage/mage is kind of redundant-looking, but I don't know
if it's worth trying to find something else.

Attachment: pgpea_RSnuKT_.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page