sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur'
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
Yeah, that must be it. I didn't find your bug, BTW, I would've reopened
it. Not supporting it is one thing, but failing so ungracefully is still
a problem.
Also, this is the first time I hear about not supporting multiple casts.
I frequently run several of them and multiple casts always work
correctly (shrug). `gaze voyeur' is a minor thing, it could pick up the
latest cast or simply bail out with a message, but the casting seems to
be unaffected by other parallel casts.
The bug wasn't for `gaze voyeur` (IIRC), but rather another component.
Multiple casts usually work, but are not supported since if you want
to install more than one app at a time you just specify them on the
commandline such as `cast <spell1> <spell2> ...`.
Anyway, line 821 of gaze should read
[ "$FILE" ] || return 1
File a bug and it will be taken care of as the Sorcery Team has time.
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC5ojTHXt9dKjv3WERAsglAKCohpXVb3Znn2A0Z9AmNCE4Egvf5ACfcJ5p
Iggz5jrdIqRTkXIw588+UHs=
=pRjB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur'
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.