sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur'
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 01:05:50 -0400
Yeah, that must be it. I didn't find your bug, BTW, I would've reopened
it. Not supporting it is one thing, but failing so ungracefully is still
a problem.
Also, this is the first time I hear about not supporting multiple casts.
I frequently run several of them and multiple casts always work
correctly (shrug). `gaze voyeur' is a minor thing, it could pick up the
latest cast or simply bail out with a message, but the casting seems to
be unaffected by other parallel casts.
Anyway, line 821 of gaze should read
[ "$FILE" ] || return 1
Sergey.
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 21:34 -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> > Hi Sorcery team!
> >
> > When casting a spell with VOYEUR=off (`dar' in this case), I get this
> > output from `gaze voyeur' on a different console:
> >
> > gaze voyeur
> > Waiting 60 seconds for a cast to begin.
> > /usr/sbin/gaze: line 821: [: dar: unary operator expected
> > /usr/sbin/gaze: line 821: [: dar: unary operator expected
> > /usr/sbin/gaze: line 821: [: dar: unary operator expected
> > /usr/sbin/gaze: line 821: [: dar: unary operator expected
> > /usr/sbin/gaze: line 821: [: dar: unary operator expected
> > /usr/sbin/gaze: line 821: [: dar: unary operator expected
> > /usr/sbin/gaze: line 821: [: dar: unary operator expected
> > ...(indefinitely)
> >
> > Should I file a bug? Thanks, Sergey.
>
> I've only gotten that when I have multiple casts going at once. All
> bugs I file to that effect are marked as WONTFIX as simultaneous
> casting is not supported/encouraged. ;)
-
[SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Andrew, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur', Eric Sandall, 07/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Glitch in `gaze voyeur',
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 07/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.