Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:41:25PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Feb 16, Geoffrey Derber [gderber AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 18:06 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > Heh, Dave and I were actually hoping to take on utils and mail together
> > > once we verify we have the time... but I'm sure there is enough work the
> > > gurus don't have to fight for things to take on.
> > 
> > One option, depending on the size of the sections may to be to break
> > them down further into sub componets.
> 
> Right.  perl-cpan is over 200 spells, and utils is almost as large.
> 
> Thomas and Arwed, if you want to talk about splitting utils up some more,
> let me know... I have no interest whatsoever in perl though.  ;)

I'm always for smaller sections, so if you can give me a logical
grouping that splits utils into seperate sections we can do that.
Utils is one of those 'drop everything in here' sections like libs, so
splitting it into more useful sections would definitely be nice.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                              Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org