sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: evraire AT tuwg.com
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: RE: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:56:52 -0000
Hello,
> Realistically how much can we expect SMGL users to know ?
While what Andrew says may be true (newbiews will grow our user base, not
sys-admins), I believe sys-admins to be prime targets of this distribution:
they like to keep on top of the configuration of their system, keep-up with
all the security fixes and aren't afraid to edit a few config files.
I think knowing your way around a linux system should be a requirement, and
by that I mean the same as Andrew: "We can edit almost any file in /etc
ourselves. We grok the file tree hierarchy and know what basically all the
main directories are for." Like Hamish, I believe users should be expected
to know a few of the basic *nix tools, although I believe he and I differ on
what's included in that set of tools.
Its important to distinguish between experienced linux users and linux
developers. A linux user probably knows what the difference between KDE (or
Gnome) and X-Windows is, knows the likely file to edit to get a particular
module loaded, knows how to get around the directory structure in a command
prompt and knows how to use man to get help. A linux developer would know
some addtional tools, such as gcc, diff, patch, and might have additional
skills like bash coding and stuff. The latter might be able to figure out
the inner workings of sorcery, our package management system, whereas the
former could not (and wouldn't be interested to).
I think it is wrong to turn away users who simply want to run their system
off our distro simply because they don't do their share of development,
especially if you're interested in increasing your user base.
My two cents,
Jonathan Evraire
evraire at tuwg.com
-----------------------------------------
Message sent via Toad-One
Anti-spam notice, this message originated from IP Address: 199.212.215.11
-----------------------------------------
-
[SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Paul Mahon, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Andrew, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, David Kowis, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Jeremy Kolb, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/01/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Ricardo Izquierdo, 12/01/2003
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
evraire, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Duane Malcolm, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Terry Ross, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Eric Sandall, 12/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Terry Ross, 12/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Eric Sandall, 12/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Hamish Greig, 12/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Eric D. Schabell M.Sc., 12/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Terry Ross, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Duane Malcolm, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.