sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 02:36:29 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Realistically how much can we expect SMGL users to know ?
if a person has been a user for 18 months or more is it wrong to expect them
to have learned to use basic *nix tools in that time and to be capable of
following simple instructions with respect to adding configure switches in
BUILD files etc ?
I had always thought if you didn't want to learn these things you would be
better off using redhat or some other binary/preconfigured distro.
Am I wrong ?
Is our long term goal to make SMGL completely foolproof for the inexperienced
users ? or is a minimum of experience required/expected ?
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/y2AC8fSufZR6424RArGoAJ9VfS7tNJXBAMJ6c27anM2SKO7owwCffTiH
ZNF4/QfZzB9jCfhYHaz0Mas=
=vn7w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Paul Mahon, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Andrew, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, David Kowis, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Jeremy Kolb, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/01/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Ricardo Izquierdo, 12/01/2003
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
evraire, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Duane Malcolm, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users, Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Duane Malcolm, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] expectations of users,
Hamish Greig, 12/01/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.