Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Having fun with SourceMage!

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: Duane Macolm <d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz>
  • Cc: eric AT sandall.us, <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Having fun with SourceMage!
  • Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:23:01 -0500 (EST)

The problem w/ milestones is that a lot of our work is fixing what worked
before, not adding funtionality (as phoenix is). I'm not saying it won't
work, I'm just pointing out a big difference.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Duane Macolm wrote:

> I think this is similar to how the phoenix browser is released. The
> phoenix developers have set milestones for each release and set
> approximate dates on each release, which they don't strictly adhere to.
> For example, for the 0.1-0.4 releases, a release day was specified (some
> were missed) and for the 0.5 release November was the release date, yet
> it wasn't released until December. The link below gives a great
> illustration of this...
>
> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/phoenix/phoenix-roadmap.html
>
> I like this method because it breaks goals into managable tasks.
>
> Duane.
>
> Eric Sandall wrote:
>
> >Casey Harkins said:
> >
> >
> >>I agree with this. Keep the grimoires and sorcery moving independent of
> >>each other. I understand this was a problem in the push to 1.0 as new
> >>sorcery features required spell modifications, but this is mostly taken
> >>care of.
> >>
> >>As far as release dates for sorcery, I agree with Dufflebank that we
> >>should still have release dates, but maybe they shouldn't be so rigid.
> >>Choose a target date, and adjust as the date draws closer.
> >>
> >>-casey
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Perhaps have Milestones, but without dates attached? Or maybe just
> >general ideas, like "Summer of 2003", or "Autumn 2009", etcetera? Once we
> >get closer to those dates, then we can narrow down to the month, perhaps
> >even the day, then if we need more time, we can extend those, but still
> >try to keep it within the Milestone timeline.
> >
> >-One of Four
> >a.k.a. sandalle
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>

--


Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page