sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness

From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
To: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
Cc: Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:26:29 +0200

Hi

>>>>> "JK" == Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu> writes:

JK> I haven't waided through the rest of my emails from the weekend,
JK> but I hope that this is fixed before 1.0. no glibc = no fun :(

This is no issue for 1.0 since only the upgrade from 2.2.5 to 2.3.1 is
affected.

Julian

[SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Robin, 10/19/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/19/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Robin, 10/19/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Jeremy Kolb, 10/20/2002
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Jeremy Kolb, 10/21/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Adam Clark, 10/24/2002
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/24/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Eric Schabell, 10/24/2002
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/24/2002
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Eric Sandall, 10/24/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, ^GiuAnZ^, 10/19/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Dufflebunk, 10/19/2002