sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sergey A Lipnevich said:
> I'm running the latest devel sorcery and glibc, and my only problem is
> GCC (there's a bug, don't recall the number). Everything else, including
> a lot of different stuff recompiled after glibc 2.3.1, runs great.
>
I trashed my laptop two days ago (well, twice in the same day ;)), so had
the chance to use the 1001 ISO (which is great, btw [ XFS! ] :)). The
first thing I did was 'scribe update', then 'cast -r -c glibc' to get
glibc 2.3.1, then 'cast -r -c gcc' to have the patch work for it (no
hitches when I did this, went flawlessly), then a 'sorcery rebuild' to
rebuild all the binary packages that came with the ISO. I then proceeded
to install my system, all using glibc 2.3.1 and the patched gcc 3.2, I am
now running WindowMaker and was playing FreeCraft (after my fixes ;)) in
class^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Haround today just to make sure all is well.
Since my clean install had no problems, perhaps something is being broken
during all of these updates/usage? Did everyone do a 'cast --fix' before
trying this, to make sure everything is koshur on their systems? That
_may_ keep things from breaking on upgrades like this, but no guarantees.
I had two other machines update to glibc 2.3.1/gcc, one lost my gcc ( Bug
# 1469 ), while the other wouldn't compile gcc for a while, then after a
'cast --fix' and some voodoo, went flawlessly. They are both doing a
'sorcery rebuild' right now to have everything take advantage of the new
glibcidness.
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
Fingerprint=14C0 C194 163E 57CB 0F1B ED87 5C8D 199A 5A31 7214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux
Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Adam Clark, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Eric Schabell, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Eric Sandall, 10/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Dufflebunk, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Geoffrey Derber, 10/20/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.