sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Sergey A Lipnevich <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: eschabell AT sourcemage.org
- Cc: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:45:13 -0400
I'm running the latest devel sorcery and glibc, and my only problem is GCC (there's a bug, don't recall the number). Everything else, including a lot of different stuff recompiled after glibc 2.3.1, runs great.
Eric Schabell wrote:
On Thursday October 24 2002 07:42, Adam Clark wrote:Julian,
Hey Julian,
This post was Monday, yet there's no ldconfig fix in either the test or
devel grimoires. What's shakin'? Isn't this a bug that needs to be
resolved before we go RC1?
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:57:21 +0200
julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock) wrote:
Hi
JK> But won't this be an issue for future glibc releases?"JK" == Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu> writes:
Probably only for 2.4, not 2.3.x. Anyway, I hope that the update
problem is solved when I add ldconfig to the BUILD script.
I am going to update the glibc spell this evening.
I am seeing lots of problems with everyone on irc... lockexec is having problems with boxes that are trying to make the transistion... I am thinking about bumping the glibc back down in test if this does not get sorted out today.... I would like to pull into stable for rc1 later tomorrow (so entire world gets a full 24 oct to fix stuff)....
------------------
Get free mailbox 20 Mb at http://www.hotbox.ru
-
[SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Adam Clark, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Eric Schabell, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Eric Sandall, 10/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Julian v. Bock, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Dufflebunk, 10/19/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Julian v. Bock, 10/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness,
Robin, 10/19/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc badness, Geoffrey Derber, 10/20/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.