sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net>
- To: Ari Steinberg <ari.steinberg AT stanford.edu>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:46:03 +1200
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 10:19:14AM -0700, Ari Steinberg wrote:
> Basically, do we really know that they're any more stable than the most
> up-to-date one? Aside from, of course, keeping GCC2, and delaying on
I was under the impression that stable referred to `less change' rather
than `less crashing'. It means that parts of the system won't
unexpectidly vanish, or change behaviour, but they still may segfault
(although hopefully less as there has still been a filtering process).
Please correct me if i'm wrong here...
--
Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net> JabberID: <eythian AT jabber.org>
Hostes alienigeni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
PGP Key 0x768B8765 Fingerprint=33C8 EA9C 61F1 F117 EEED 24A5 3BCE 4F77 768B
8765
Attachment:
pgpcU3SVir45X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Tobias Marx, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Dufflebunk, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Jason Flatt, 07/29/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Tony Smith, 07/30/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.