Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net>
  • To: Ari Steinberg <ari.steinberg AT stanford.edu>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches
  • Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:46:03 +1200

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 10:19:14AM -0700, Ari Steinberg wrote:
> Basically, do we really know that they're any more stable than the most
> up-to-date one? Aside from, of course, keeping GCC2, and delaying on
I was under the impression that stable referred to `less change' rather
than `less crashing'. It means that parts of the system won't
unexpectidly vanish, or change behaviour, but they still may segfault
(although hopefully less as there has still been a filtering process).
Please correct me if i'm wrong here...

--
Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net> JabberID: <eythian AT jabber.org>

Hostes alienigeni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?

PGP Key 0x768B8765 Fingerprint=33C8 EA9C 61F1 F117 EEED 24A5 3BCE 4F77 768B
8765

Attachment: pgpcU3SVir45X.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page