sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,
- From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,
- Date: 27 Jul 2002 16:01:25 -0600
Oh...could that be the prob?...sheesh...
On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 15:27, Dufflebunk wrote:
> You do mean packages.backup not packages.bak, right?
>
> On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 16:42, Bearcat M. Sandor wrote:
> > Thanx all,
> >
> > I don't know what the solution is, but here is the provlem.
> >
> > When I do a sorcery update, it takes my /var/state/sorcery/packages
> > file and erses all of it but about 10 lines. I have Dufflebunk's
> > wonderful rebuildPackages script to recreate that file (and copy it to
> > the .bak) but everytime i run a 'sorcery update' it get almost
> > completely deleted.
> >
> >
> > is this a bug i the latest version of sorcery? I'm using the devl codex
> > and sorcery version 20020527
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bearcat
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
> --
>
>
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
> -----------------
> PGP public key at
> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x92B5D3F1
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, bluebird, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Tobias Marx, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Dufflebunk, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Jason Flatt, 07/29/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Tony Smith, 07/30/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.