msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Mounted search and rescue
List archive
- From: "Julie Hensley" <julie@petwearusa.com>
- To: "Mounted search and rescue" <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:29:51 -0400
Many people are intense,... they still have to maintain a responsibility to
themselves and others.
I would think the first responsibility is considering your goals in sharing
the information you offer.. at the rate this conversation is going there
will soon be no one listening to it. If you are so intense that you "turn
off" your chosen audience... can you be successful in your argument?
It's clear that people are NOT leaving due to the volume of posts but due to
the attitude being assumed within this current topic. While this topic
could have alot going for it in regards to its import, significance, etc.,
it is obviously not one that most on the list feel they have anything to
contribute to (or are not willing to due to the reception they would
receive) as determined by the few participants in this thread.
If there is another list for MSAR, please email me privately with its
location. My interest (as others) in this list is waning.
Julie
Julie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Una Smith" <una@lanl.gov>
To: "Mounted search and rescue" <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards
> Mike et al.,
>
> FWIW, Jorene and I have been Usenet acquaintances for many
> years, and in those years we have argued many times before.
> I suppose you anticipate this thread degenerating into ugly
> ad hominems. That won't happen; Jorene and I both know
> better. The process of thoroughly chewing over a complex
> issue, as we are doing now, is often intense but generally
> useful. Both of us know this and how to keep our tempers
> in check. Those of you who have met me in person know that
> I come across as intense even when relaxed. This can make
> others uncomfortable, I know, but all I can suggest is try
> to let it go.
>
> I think this thread has been useful, in shedding light on
> the political and practical aspects of designing a standard
> and promulgating it at a national level, in an environment
> where most user groups who would adopt such a standard are
> not national entities.
>
> Una Smith
> Santa Fe County Sheriff's Posse, in New Mexico
> _______________________________________________
> MSAR-riders mailing list
> MSAR-riders@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/msar-riders
>
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards
, (continued)
- Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards, Mike Dillard, 10/21/2003
-
[MSAR] NASAR Standards,
Thomas and Christy Matthews, 10/22/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR Standards,
pennbo, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR Standards,
tm-fi, 10/23/2003
- RE: [MSAR] NASAR Standards, Jeff Ezell, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR Standards,
tm-fi, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR Standards,
pennbo, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR Standards,
SARCRNA, 10/22/2003
- Re: [MSAR] NASAR Standards, pennbo, 10/23/2003
- Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards, Mike Dillard, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards,
Mike Dillard, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards,
Una Smith, 10/23/2003
- Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards, Julie Hensley, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] Agree to disagree,
wwfarm, 10/23/2003
- RE: [MSAR] Agree to disagree, Jeff Ezell, 10/23/2003
-
Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards,
Una Smith, 10/23/2003
- Re: [MSAR] NASAR standards, Mike Dillard, 10/23/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.