livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
- From: "TradingPostPaul" <tradingpost@riseup.net>
- To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:53:26 -0600
My thoughts on it interspersed.
paul, tradingpost@riseup.net
---------------
The care of the Earth is our most ancient and most worthy, and after all our
most pleasing responsibility. To cherish what remains of it and to foster its
renewal is our only hope.
- Wendell Berry
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 4/30/2006 at 12:30 AM Keith Addison wrote:
>Yet many small farmers and homesteaders in the US are using biogas right
>now.
Ok, but the question remains, what makes it practical or economical for them
- if it is - and would it be practical across the board for family farms in
different climates, and those without large numbers of livestock? I'm
suspecting it's most practical for large feedlots which we really find
abominable.
>They (Nepalese) don't compare it with the cost of fossil fuels. Smallscale
>biogas units are in use all over the world.
Where they have plenty of livestock and few alternatives for fuel, they might
find biogas practical.
>They're not wildly conflicting and they're not all government
>studies. Eight studies over the last 10 years show a net gain of
>between 15,000 and 30,000, only Pimentel shows a 33,500 loss - 45
>btu's less than he claimed 10 years previously, despite considerable
>changes in farm practice in the meanrtime, as shown. Anyway, who
>cares about Pimentel and ADM? It's just irrelevant to a real soil
>farmer.
Pimentel as you know headed a government panel to study the economics of
ethanol, and I see no obvious reason to throw him out and credit the later
studies by similar panels. I just don't give much credibility to followup
government studies and corn growers' studies to justify enormous subsidies
for corn ethanol. To me, it sends up red flags all over the place. My
personal view on that.
>$200 to build a 5 gal per hour still with a 55-gal oildrum boiler?
>Hardly. People are doing this right now on US farms. This is nothing
>new, go back 25 years to when Pimentel's figures might have had a
>little more reality:
>The Butterfield Still -- Farm-scale ethanol fuel production plant
>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library.html#butterfield
>Farmers in the US were doing that then and a lot more of them are doing it
>now.
But we're not seeing the whole economic analysis of it. The startup cost may
be low, but the opportunity cost is overlooked. In other words, how much do
they lose in not selling or using their ethanol crops for food, compared to
what they save by substituting ethanol for gasoline?
>... Please see:
>"How much fuel can we grow? How much land will it take?"
>http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html#howmuch
That page states "A sustainable mixed farm can produce all its own fuel,
with much or possibly all of it coming from crop by-products and waste
products without any dedicated land use, and with very low input levels."
But I have a problem with that. Which byproducts and crop waste is *not*
needed to return to the soil? None I can think of. Again, there's the
economics of it, the opportunity cost. Anything used to produce fuel could
instead be returned to the soil directly or composted. Is anything gained
when you turn crop waste into ethanol and have to truck in organic matter to
take its place in soil building?
>No, livestock do though, and that's what's done with most of the corn
>anyway
But we don't need more livestock; we need to eliminate corporate feedlots and
devote more land to people food instead of grain for cattle. If this country
cuts way, way back on beef (and other meats) as it ought, there won't be many
livestock to eat that ethanol-processed corn. Of course, it could still be
composted ;-)
>It's not just theory. Most people are only starting to think about
>this now, when it's beginning to hurt. We've been watching it playing
>out in the real world for six years and it's been going on much
>longer than that.
We'll see.
>Best wishes
>
>Keith Addison
>Journey to Forever
>KYOTO Pref., Japan
>http://journeytoforever.org/
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss
, (continued)
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Scott Berkey, 04/28/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/28/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Scott Berkey, 04/28/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, TradingPostPaul, 04/28/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Scott Berkey, 04/28/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/28/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Robert Norsen, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/29/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol Brazil is exporting., Robert Norsen, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Keith Addison, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Keith Addison, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Keith Addison, 04/30/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, TradingPostPaul, 04/30/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Robert Norsen, 04/30/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, TradingPostPaul, 04/30/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Keith Addison, 04/30/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Robert Norsen, 04/29/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, Keith Addison, 04/30/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, Tom Chapin, 04/30/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Keith Addison, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
TradingPostPaul, 04/29/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, Mark Nagel, 04/29/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, Mark Nagel, 04/29/2006
- Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss, Ryan Albinger, 04/30/2006
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Ethanol a net energy loss,
Scott Berkey, 04/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.