internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh
- From: burnett AT pobox.com
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:50:25 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Sil Greene wrote:
> wait just one cotton-pickin' minute. where's all that carp i learned in
> Gov-Ec about checks and balances? i can understand a limited waiver,
> maybe, so long as the limits are sane... but my impressions of any waiver
> of legislation for ANY reason is a 6-letter word: stupid.
>
> this has gotta be unconstitutional... isn't it??
>
> and this is in the Real-ID bill??!!
Yes, this is in the Real ID bill. Which the US House of Representatives
voted 261 to 161 on Thursday, February 10 to pass. But the US Senate
hasn't seen the bill yet.
Steve B
> from Phillip Rhodes:
> >
> > Umm... Just had a chance to really read the other part. Check
> > this out:
> >
> > SEC. 102. WAIVER OF LAWS NECESSARY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF BARRIERS AT BORDERS.
> [snip]
> > `(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
> > Secretary of
> > Homeland Security shall have the authority to waive, and shall waive, all
> > laws such Secretary, in such Secretary's sole discretion, determines
> > necessary to ensure expeditious construction of the barriers and roads
> > under
> > this section.
> >
> > `(2) NO JUDICIAL REVIEW- Notwithstanding any other provision of law
> > (statutory or nonstatutory), no court shall have jurisdiction--
> >
> > `(A) to hear any cause or claim arising from any action undertaken, or
> > any
> > decision made, by the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to
> > paragraph
> > (1); or
> >
> > `(B) to order compensatory, declaratory, injunctive, equitable, or any
> > other
> > relief for damage alleged to arise from any such action or decision.'.
> >
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
--
Steve Burnett burnett AT pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~burnett/
System Administration Technical Documentation Information Retrieval
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh, Alan MacHett, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/10/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/10/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, thomas, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Sil Greene, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, burnett, 02/13/2005
- RE: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Jim Ray, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, thomas, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/10/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.