internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh
- From: Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:07:28 -0500
Umm... Just had a chance to really read the other part. Check
this out:
SEC. 102. WAIVER OF LAWS NECESSARY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF BARRIERS AT BORDERS.
Section 102(c) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note) is amended to read as follows:
`(c) Waiver-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall have the authority to waive, and shall waive, all laws such Secretary, in such Secretary's sole discretion, determines necessary to ensure expeditious construction of the barriers and roads under this section.
`(2) NO JUDICIAL REVIEW- Notwithstanding any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), no court shall have jurisdiction--
`(A) to hear any cause or claim arising from any action undertaken, or any decision made, by the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to paragraph (1); or
`(B) to order compensatory, declaratory, injunctive, equitable, or any other relief for damage alleged to arise from any such action or decision.'.
So, if this becomes law, the DHS can basically do any damn
thing they want, with no judicial review, if it's in the name
of building barriers and roads at the borders. Whoooah.
TTYL,
Phil
--
Don't blame me, I voted for Badnarik
Free America - Vote Libertarian
www.lp.org
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Ian Meyer, 02/08/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/08/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/09/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh, Alan MacHett, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/10/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/10/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, thomas, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Sil Greene, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Phillip Rhodes, 02/13/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, burnett, 02/13/2005
- RE: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, Jim Ray, 02/14/2005
- Re: [internetworkers] "Real ID" bill - was W Visit to Raleigh, thomas, 02/13/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/10/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Tanner Lovelace, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Phillip Rhodes, 02/08/2005
-
Re: [internetworkers] W Visit to Raleigh,
Ian Meyer, 02/08/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.