Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Jeremy Portzer <jeremyp AT pobox.com>]

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 08:57, zman wrote:

> They were not a part of Bush's war on terror. Now they are operating with 
> Guerilla tactics, pretty uch the same as we encoutnered in Vietnam. These 
> people you are labeling terrorists now aren't the people W was chasing. 
> These are not the Al Qada. These are not the ones responsible for 9/11. To 
> try and justify our invasion of Iraq by lumping them in there with them 
> is highly inaccurate, but par for the course as far as the Bush loyal are 
> concerned.
> 

Isn't it pretty ironic that Bush supposedly invaded Iraq because it was
creating a climate for terrorists (e.g. Al Queda).  But what has the
invasion resulted in, but a climate that is now amenable to many
terrorist organizations of all types.  Rather than reducing terrorism,
he has increased it multiple times.   Isn't that the definition of
failure?

Jeremy

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        jeremyp AT pobox.com      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part