internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News
- From: Evan Zimmerman <evan.zimmerman AT gmail.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:04:53 -0400
I know we haven't met yet, but you can call me Evan :-)
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:01:00 -0400, James Dasher <jdasher AT ibiblio.org> wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2004, at 11:04 AM, matusiak wrote:
>
> > On Oct 8, 2004, at 6:46 AM, James Dasher wrote:
> >
> >> That assumes that everyone everywhere will always stridently lie.
> >> But a few bald-faced lies? They generally get uncovered. Then
> >> people make up their own minds.
> >
> > This media bias discussion is getting tired to the Nth degree, but I
> > had to counter this fallacy.
> >
> > If these people are all making up their own minds, then why does 1/3
> > of the country still believe that Saddam and Iraq toppled the WTC? Is
> > this simply their own personal version of The Truth? (as you note
> > there is no monopoly on "The Truth").
>
> My point was that people make up their own minds. Mr. Zimmerman
> replied to the CNN bit, saying he "went and read his statement, and it
> sounded more like someone who felt forced to conceal information for
> the sake of protecting sources or to prevent further harm from coming
> to an employee. That may be a limited reading or only the "intended
> takeaway", but on the whole I find it disagreeable but not something to
> indict him for."
>
> That's Mr. Zimmerman's analysis and interpretation. Not everyone
> agrees. The point is that people have alternatives. That Mr.
> Zimmerman can make up his own mind, in spite of contrary
> interpretations. That his choices aren't stifled by people who
> disagree with his sources, and that he's free to choose which sources
> he trusts.
>
> I think it's kind of funny that people get so revved up over Fox News.
> I think it's kind of weird that people blame Fox News for all the
> misinformation under the sun.
>
> I say this as a consumer of (possibly unhealthy levels of) information
> from all varieties of outlets in all media, from Fox News to IndyMedia.
>
> On this we can agree, though: this thread is tiring "to the Nth degree".
>
>
>
> Cheers --
>
> --
> James Dasher
> misterdasher dot com
> IM misterdasher
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
--
Evan
_________________________
evan.zimmerman AT gmail.com
http://evanz.org
-
Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others)
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Scott, 10/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), burnett, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Shea Tisdale, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), burnett, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
Don Rua, 10/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News, Evan Zimmerman, 10/09/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
James Dasher, 10/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News, Evan Zimmerman, 10/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News, James Dasher, 10/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
James Dasher, 10/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News, Evan Zimmerman, 10/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.