internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
- From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:52:28 -0400
No doubt about it the bubble burst 10 months prior to this last election and
nearly everyone I knew lost their job.
But it's hard to argue with the numbers released 10 days ago. When
economists expect 123,000 new jobs and the labor department reports 308,000
new jobs I'd say it's a huge stretch to characterize job growth as "poor".
-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Czeiszperger
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:41 PM
To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
On Apr 12, 2004, at 2:59 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
> Job growth is poor? Perhaps you didn't see the numbers for March and
> the
> revised numbers for January and February.
In 2001 and 2002 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics
http://www.bls.gov, the combined net job loss was 11,130,000. That's
eleven million jobs gone. You can look it up yourself just as I did.
They haven't published the actual revised figures from the 1st quarter
of 2003 so I can't comment, but the original 1st quarter figures as
published on the BLS website was for a net job loss of 658,000 in the
1st quarter of 2003.
When you're dealing with large numbers, its easy to get excited, but
you have to remember that the point is to compare the job growth
figures with what we should have. The reason its called a "jobless
recovery" is the job growth is less than half what you'd expect IF the
economy was in a recovery given the reported increase in the gross
domestic product.
Here's the table I calculated for the last few years:
Net Job Gain/Loss
2000: +1,961,000
2001: -10,774,000
2002:-356,000
2003: (1Q) -658,000
________________________________________________________________________
_________
If you put up a large switch in a cave somewhere, with a sign on it
saying "End-
of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH", the paint wouldn't even have
time
to dry. -- Pratchett
-- michael at czeiszperger dot org, Chapel Hill, NC
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Thomas Beckett, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
zman, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Ron Thigpen, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Ilan Volow, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
zman, 04/12/2004
-
[internetworkers] Re: Economic growth figures rigged?,
Lance A. Brown, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Economic growth figures rigged?, zman, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
zman, 04/12/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.