internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:07:03 -0400
so we have manual labor jobs as well as stuff like harris teeter providing jobs, but what we still need is jobs for people lik i was talking about before, the people who are trained, have experience, and should be able to get jobs in their fields, not have to get a job at the HT because they dont want to be on welfare anymore
~ian
On Apr 12, 2004, at 3:34 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
You're still not getting it. It's not payroll dollar amounts but an increase in the number of payrolls (job increases).
Read the report:
<http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm>
"Payroll job growth was fairly widespread, as construction employment rose sharply and several major service-providing industries also added jobs."
-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Ian Meyer
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:27 PM
To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
still, payroll increases do not necessarily correlate with job increases
i mean, a handful of execs getting million dollar bonuses could tweak
numbers like that
(not that i am just putting that forward, not saying it applies, im
busy so i didnt read the data...yet)
~ian
On Apr 12, 2004, at 3:03 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
> You guys are getting it all wrong. The massive job growth reported on
> April
> 2nd was a measure of *payroll* increase, not a measure of the number of
> unemployment claims.
>
> <http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Ian
> Meyer
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 2:19 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/;
> kurt.schlatzer AT flashpoint.com
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?
>
> Why, if you aren't on unemployment, you *must* be employed!
>
> Its not possible that someone could possible not get a job, and even if
> their unemployment ran out instead of ending early, I'm sure that it
> was immediately followed by getting hired
>
> So of course, less people on unemployment means more people in jobs, it
> can't be that there are so few jobs that people are running out of
> unemployment and still not finding work, no, that can't be happening!
>
> Jeez...I feel so unclean after typing that...
>
> I had a gentleman come through my line the other day at the HT, he was
> clean, average dressed (not fancy, but clean clothes, reasonably nice)
> and it was his first time using his new EBT (Electronic Benefit
> Transfer--welfare) card to buy groceries after he lost his job. He was
> even asking about if we were hiring at the HT. Now, I know better than
> to judge a book by its cover, but something tells me that when someone
> that looks like they have more than half a brain and obviously work
> experience is thinking about taking an unskilled labor job such as
> working at a grocery store, there is something wrong going on.
>
> My $0.02
> Ian
>
> On Apr 12, 2004, at 1:56 PM, Kurt Schlatzer wrote:
>
>> Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
>>
>>> For a while now we've been told the economy's in a recovery, but have
>>> been wondering why there isn't more job growth.
>>
>> It seems like we continuously hear that the number of people claiming
>> unemployment compensation keeps dropping and it's spun as job growth.
>> I
>> wonder if people who exhaust their unemployment benefits and remain
>> unemployed are still counted among the unemployed, or if they drop off
>> the
>> roster. When I exhausted my benefits, nobody cared if I found work
>> after
>> that point and I didn't have to turn in work search reports to the
>> ESC.
>>
>> Kurt Schlatzer
>> www.kurtschlatzer.com
>>
>> ---
>> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
>> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
>> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
>> To unsubscribe visit
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>>
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Kurt Schlatzer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Thomas Beckett, 04/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Ian Meyer, 04/12/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, burnett, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Kurt Schlatzer, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?, Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Tony Spencer, 04/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Economic growth figures rigged?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 04/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.