Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Mark Turner <markt AT siteseers.net>]

Sil Greene wrote:
> Reported 04.03.09 20:56 from James Dasher:
> .:On Tuesday, Mar 9, 2004, at 20:18 US/Eastern, Sil Greene wrote:
(snip)
>  As a result, whether you 
> .:use a point-and-shoot or digital SLR, digital prints always look - 
> .:well, *digital*. 
(snip)
> Face it, oh tech companies of the world -- digital, for all it's pros and 
> all your R&D dollars, doesn't hold a candle to analog.

If you believe that, you're using the wrong digital cameras. I am an 
old-school film camera type of guy who never thought he'd be satisfied 
with a digital camera. Seemed wrong to me.

But then I got a 5 megapixel Canon Powershot S50 and it changed my mind. 
I haven't picked up my film camera since! The quality is as good or 
better than film, and in many ways superior.

I especially like how it performs in low light. I'm able to take 
pictures with digital that I'd need to ruin with a flash if I was using 
film.

(I'd point you to my online gallery, but the pictures there have been 
reduced with ImageMagick to a less-than-optimal quality. Purely 
ImageMagick's fault.)

--
Mark Turner
www.markturner.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature