internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Alan MacHett" <machett AT ibiblio.org>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:39:00 -0500 (EST)
In response to Tanner Lovelace's message(s):
> It should be pretty obvious now what's happening. When you reply
> to a message, your mailer adds either a References or an In-Reply-To
> header (or both!) with a reference to the e-mail you're replying to.
> This lets a mail program thread messages without having to guess
> based on something like subject header lines (which wouldn't work
> in any case here except your reply to me because the subject line
> was changed each time).
>
> Hopefully that clears up some things. If you want the full
> technical detail, the link to Jamie Zawinski's page is very good.
>
Good explanations, both. I've got it now, and I shall amend my ways.
Though, for maximum (mis)effect I could always bounce messages off another
account and reply to myself before posting.... ;)
-Alan
-
RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
, (continued)
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Michael D. Thomas, 03/10/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/09/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Paul Smith, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tom Boucher, 03/10/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Alan MacHett, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Chris Grindstaff, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Alan MacHett, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Shea Tisdale, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Steven Champeon, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, James Dasher, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, zman, 03/08/2004
- [internetworkers] FUD101, Don Rua, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] FUD101, zman, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] FUD101, James Dasher, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] FUD101, Jeremy Portzer, 03/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.