internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- From: "Michael D. Thomas" <mdthomas AT mindspring.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:15:54 -0500
> It appears to be because Jim's client inserts a Reply-to header, which
> most
> clients can be configured to do.
>
> -- Michael Best
Thanks for the technical explanation. Sounds like there are some
interesting technical issues wrt email clients. I think that such
technical discussions of such technical issues is valuable to a list of
Internet technical folks. I hope we can continue to have such open and
informative technical interchange.
-
Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies)
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Sil Greene, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Sil Greene, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Steven Champeon, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Michael Best, 03/09/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/09/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/09/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Michael Best, 03/10/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Michael D. Thomas, 03/10/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/09/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Paul Smith, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tom Boucher, 03/10/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Alan MacHett, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Chris Grindstaff, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Replying to e-mails, Alan MacHett, 03/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.