internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:03:13 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
oops...sorry for the confustion...i meant to say that the eliminatiion example was the same as the button example.
sorry bout that.
~ian
- -------------------------
What's that file that's attached you ask? Well, its my Gnu Privacy Guard (GnuPG) signature that can be used to authenticate this email. For more information, check out http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
On Mar 5, 2004, at 3:47 PM, David R.Matusiak wrote:
To Ian: Matthew Frye != Tony Spencer-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:56 PM, Ian Meyer wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
i disagree. i think it is the same as what you did. to take something from a bygone era since since which politics have changed greatly and use it to refute an attack on a current topic.
~ian
On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:51 PM, Frye, Matthew wrote:
<snip>
so, if a candidate had their competition "eliminated" sometime in the
past 100 years, it would be "okay" for one to do it present day?
That's a completely ludicrous example.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFASOsSDaRr/N2jLBARAmrmAKCQfCFkZjlHoSOSsosh7vPv1gex4gCfQUoF
PMm7yKPJ7QN2WNQbrxPTlVI=
=5cq5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Diana Duncan, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Paul Jones, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tanner Lovelace, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Parker, David X, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Jeremy Portzer, 03/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tom Boucher, 03/07/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Colleen McCarthy, 03/07/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tom Boucher, 03/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Jeremy Portzer, 03/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Parker, David X, 03/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.