internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:51:19 -0500
$tony_spencer = 'sanity on the internetworkers list';
// :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf
> Of David R.Matusiak
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:47 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
>
> To Ian: Matthew Frye != Tony Spencer
>
> On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:56 PM, Ian Meyer wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > i disagree. i think it is the same as what you did. to take
> something
> > from a bygone era since since which politics have changed
> greatly and
> > use it to refute an attack on a current topic.
> >
> > ~ian
> >
> > On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:51 PM, Frye, Matthew wrote:
> >
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> so, if a candidate had their competition "eliminated"
> sometime in the
> >> past 100 years, it would be "okay" for one to do it present day?
> >>
> >> That's a completely ludicrous example.
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Steven Champeon, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, James Dasher, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, zman, 03/08/2004
- [internetworkers] FUD101, Don Rua, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] FUD101, zman, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] FUD101, James Dasher, 03/09/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] FUD101, Jeremy Portzer, 03/09/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Paul Jones, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tanner Lovelace, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.