internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Colleen McCarthy" <cmccarthy1 AT nc.rr.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
- Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:32:48 -0500
Sigh... Edwards was the best. I'll still vote for "Kerry and Whomever", but
Edwards' intelligence, values, drive, and integrity still made him the best
candidate in my book.
Bummer on VA, bummer on Carolina, great on State-- but really trivial in the
overall scheme of things. Sports is a great diversion, but politics sets
the course of our lives.
Off to sleep...
Colleen
Colleen McCarthy, MT(ASCP), BSEE, MBA, PMP
LIS Administrator
Laboratory Information Services
UNC Hospitals/McLendon Clinical Labs
1106 East Wing
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
email: camccart AT unch.unc.edu
phone: 919-966-2059 beeper 216-1995
fax: 919-966-6407
home phone 919-460-0641
-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org]On Behalf Of Tom
Boucher
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 11:03 PM
To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
On Mar 7, 2004, at 10:14 PM, Jeremy Portzer wrote:
>
> Don't forget that those same commercials also mention 9/11 and talk
> about how Kerry has "sounded the alarm on terrorism". But there's been
> no outrage about that apparently. The media has managed to keep that
> out of the discussion. "You decide" why (in the Fox News tradition)...
> :-)
For the record, I don't like Bush. Personally I think any candidate
for any office that would run ads touting any type of 'strength' in
relation to 9/11 seems rather crappy in my book.
However, when Kerry (who at this point I'm voting for) drug some
vietnam vet he saved or something goofy like that on stage I lost
respect for him because I thought he was playing the 'military' card.
Personally I really liked Edwards instead. Didn't see any blatant
grandstanding like that and I really hope he is given the veep
opportunity.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tanner Lovelace, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Parker, David X, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Jeremy Portzer, 03/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tom Boucher, 03/07/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Colleen McCarthy, 03/07/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tom Boucher, 03/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Jeremy Portzer, 03/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Parker, David X, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.