Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Shea Tisdale" <shea AT sheatisdale.com>
  • To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.
  • Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:19:45 -0500

Michael Czeiszperger wrote:


> I spent some time listening to Mr. Limbaugh lecture on the Gay Marriage
> issue yesterday, and so am familiar with the arguments against it.
> There's only one problem with them, and that's the constitution.
> There's no way that excluding a class of people from getting married
> will stand as equal protection. You can rationalize it all you want,
> but marriage as an institution for heterosexual couples can only go the
> way of separate but equal.

So how would this fit with restrictions imposed on those who believe in
polygamy?

> I believe this is the reason for the movement to introduce an amendment
> to the constitution regarding marriage. It would bring political
> returns for those introducing it, and could potentially postpone having
> the court taking any court challenges on the subject.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page