internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: James Manning <jmm AT sublogic.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:31:46 -0500
> I use RFC 2919/2368 headers on my list - no C/R system should /ever/
> respond to a message with such headers; at best, it should build a
> whitelist of known legit mailing lists and avoid them. As for whether
> a spammer can get around it - all the message needs is a legit email
> for the reply-to, and ten minutes with perl to work around C/R. Give
> the spammers a few months, if they haven't already determined ways to
> work around the more popular systems.
That's the main reason I like SPF records, it moves the problem-space
over to DNS, which is still a viable attack vector, but raises the
effort level to much higher values and should put it about the
risk/reward threshold that keeps spam a viable economic activity.
http://spf.pobox.com/
So, whatcha think about SPF records, Steve?
--
James Manning <http://www.sublogic.com/james/>
GPG Key fingerprint = B913 2FBD 14A9 CE18 B2B7 9C8E A0BF B026 EEBB F6E4
-
RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
, (continued)
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Thomas Beckett, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Kurt Schlatzer, 11/19/2003
- [internetworkers] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Rowland Smith, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers][kook!] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Sil Greene, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Shea Tisdale, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Shea Tisdale, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, James Manning, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- C/R system math - Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Jeremy Portzer, 11/20/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.