internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Shea Tisdale" <shea AT sheatisdale.com>
- To: <kurt AT kurtschlatzer.com>, "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:04:09 -0500
That looks like an interesting product Kurt. Thanks for posting it.
I've also watching early implementations of Challenged Response. I
think that could also be very helpful in eliminating spam.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-
> bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Schlatzer
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:00 AM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
>
> Dave M. wrote:
> > Personally, I don't know /what/ to do about spam. I mean, I get a
lot
> > of it, but I try not to let that bother me and simply hit 'delete' a
> > lot. Thankfully, I don't have to run any mail servers and don't see
> > these problems on a daily basis.
>
> I use Outlook [ducks]. I've discovered a little gem called Spamnet
from
> Cloudmark:
>
> http://www.cloudmark.com
>
> Kurt
> www.kurtschlatzer.com
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
, (continued)
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, James Manning, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [Law/Econ] SPAM the SPAMMERS, Alan MacHett, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Thomas Beckett, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Kurt Schlatzer, 11/19/2003
- [internetworkers] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Rowland Smith, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers][kook!] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Sil Greene, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Shea Tisdale, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Shea Tisdale, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, James Manning, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/20/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.