internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Tanner Lovelace <lovelace AT wayfarer.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:49:51 -0500
Michael D. Thomas wrote:
- An entity can stop another entity from sending spam to email accounts
it owns -- i.e., Glaxo can tell a spammer that it can't send spam to any
Glaxo account. (I'm stopping short of saying that an ISP could tell a
spammer not to send to any of its accounts b/c ISPs don't own those
accounts. However, an ISP could act on behalf of its customers in this
regard.)
While I see what you're trying to get at here, I think you may
have perhaps taking it a bit too far. What if it's a whistleblower
trying to e-mail everyone in the company about something unethical
the company is doing? The company could go after that person as
a spammer with the law you've described. I'm not sure what a good
compromise would be, though.
Oh, and one other thing. When you say "faking headers must be punishable"
you should also be more specific too. Say, faking headers to indicate
that this message comes from a particular e-mail address or domain or
path should be punishable and not adding an X-MyCustomHeader. Yes,
I agree that sounds somewhat silly, but I'd rather be more specific
than less specific in this case because this is america and if there's
a new way to sue someone, somebody will use it. *sigh*
Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace | lovelace(at)wayfarer.org | http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
GPG Fingerprint = A66C 8660 924F 5F8C 71DA BDD0 CE09 4F8E DE76 39D4
GPG Key can be found at http://wtl.wayfarer.org/lovelace.gpg.asc
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as
kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic
pills and listening to repetitive electronic music."
Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, zman, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, James Manning, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [Law/Econ] SPAM the SPAMMERS, Alan MacHett, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Thomas Beckett, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Kurt Schlatzer, 11/19/2003
- [internetworkers] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Rowland Smith, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers][kook!] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Sil Greene, 11/19/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Shea Tisdale, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Shea Tisdale, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, James Manning, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/19/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.