internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act
- From: Steven Champeon <schampeo AT hesketh.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:04:20 -0500
on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:47:59PM -0500, Sil Greene wrote:
>
>
> Jeez. You guys are a little hung up on technicalities.
You'll forgive me for being hung up on technicalities. Spammers waste far
too much of my time as it is - I don't need naive antispammers wasting even
more of my time and resources out of ignorance, even benign ignorance.
The last time we were joe jobbed, we got 27K bounces and a few hundred
people replying to the spam (sent with forged envelope sender of a
nonexistent address in our domain). Replying to spam is stupid.
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: (919) 834-2552 f: (919) 834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
Book publishing is second only to furniture delivery in slowness. -b. schneier
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act
, (continued)
- RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, Jeremy Portzer, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, zman, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, James Manning, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [Law/Econ] SPAM the SPAMMERS, Alan MacHett, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Thomas Beckett, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Kurt Schlatzer, 11/19/2003
- [internetworkers] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Rowland Smith, 11/19/2003
- Re: [internetworkers][kook!] Estimating the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow, Sil Greene, 11/19/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.