internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act
- From: zman <zman AT gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:09:27 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Steven Champeon wrote:
> Dear God, no. Most of the spam I see has a forged sender.
Ditto over here.
> The only solution to spam is to lock up the spammers, after starving their
> resources, escalating their costs, and doing everything in your power /not/
> to accept the spam in the first place. Anything else is naive or pointless.
Can we tar & feather them? That would be fun, or maybe cane them. I would
enjoy it and have no ethical qualms about it.
--
Scott H. Zekanis
zman AT kungfumonkey.com
http://www.rod-o-rama.com
http://www.thehellbenders.com
1957 Buick Riviera Hardtop (2 dr., 364" Nailhead)
1959 GMC in Chevy Sheetmetal 1/2 Ton (235" Inline 6)
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act
, (continued)
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, Jeremy Portzer, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, zman, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, James Manning, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] [Law/Econ] SPAM the SPAMMERS, Alan MacHett, 11/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Thomas Beckett, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Tanner Lovelace, 11/19/2003
-
[internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS,
David R . Matusiak, 11/18/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: SPAM the SPAMMERS, Kurt Schlatzer, 11/19/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.