internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act
- From: "Michael D. Thomas" <mdthomas AT mindspring.com>
- To: <machett AT ibiblio.org>, "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:28:29 -0500
> I suppose I need clarification of what is meant by "private right of
> action":
Private right of action means right to sue. I couldn't find a
definition, but here it is in context:
"The Birmingham School Board has claimed in court that even if Jackson
is right, he has no case. It argues that Title IX does not create a
"private right of action" for retaliation -- that is, even if the school
retaliated, the statute does not allow Jackson to sue it for damages, or
even prohibit the school from retaliating in this way. "
-
[internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM" act,
Jeremy Portzer, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act, Michael D. Thomas, 11/18/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 -"CANSPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CANSPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/17/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, Jeremy Portzer, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Steven Champeon, 11/18/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act, zman, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Alan MacHett, 11/18/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Sil Greene, 11/17/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Call your Rep. now to oppose S.877 - "CAN SPAM"act,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.