Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Diana Duncan <art2mis AT nc.rr.com>]

Thanks for the pointer.  At least now I feel I have another choice.  And I do 
have to agree that anyone is better than Helms.  Now I just have to decide if 
it's important enough to me that Republicans not gain control of the Senate, 
or if I should just go ahead and vote for the Libertarian. 

You know, in Britain you can "spoil" your ballot, and they report those 
figures.  What I would love to see in this country is the ability to vote for 
"none of the above" in each contest.  If no single candidate received more 
votes than there were "no" votes, we'd have to go back to the primary 
elections and get us some new candidates.  I believe that this system would 
certainly increase voter turnout -- and we'd hopefully get much better 
representatives.


On Wednesday 16 October 2002 09:10 pm, you wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 06:04 PM, Diana Duncan wrote:
> > Our Senators directly affect our lives more than the President does.
> > Unfortuneately, I believe we're screwed with either of these.  Can
> > anyone
> > give me some hope for the future?  :)
>
> Don't forget that there's another choice on the ballot this year:
>
> http://www.seanhaugh.com/
>
> --Wade
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! 
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/ You are currently subscribed to
> InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers