homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: "Lynn Wigglesworth" <lynnw1366 AT hotmail.com>
- To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:36:49 -0400
I don't have knowledge of the things you cite; hurricane shutters and native plants...not regulated here, and auto insurance is dirt cheap here, so I'd have it anyway (when I lived in the city I was hit twice by people without insurance, and was out the money...not worth taking people with nothing to court, so I approve of requiring minimum insurance).
What ticks me off is seeing the government openly favoring one company over others in the labeling laws. No one has to put on the label that they use rGBH in their milk, for example, and others are NOT ALLOWED to say they don't use it. No one is required to put on the label that they use GMOs in their products, so how can people choose to avoid them? I've been writing letters for truth in labeling for many many years, for all the good it's done. Monsanto has had government in their pocket for many administrations, both Repubs and Dems. "Two heads of the same corporate monster", as Nader says.
Lynn Wigglesworth
----- Original Message ----- From: "Leslie" <cayadopi AT yahoo.com>
To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!
________________________________
From: Marie McHarry
<< I suspect that Americans will have to take to the streets to protest corporate control of our
lives before things improve. >>>
Agree.
<<<Even here I read posts railing against "government regulation" of the sale of milk, eggs, and farm produce. >>>
About time.
<< Yeah, the government enforces the regulations, but it's Big Bidness that wants to eliminate the competition. >>
Agree.
<<<Let's be clear who the enemy is.>>>
Yes, let's be clear on who the enemy is.........
-----
We already are under corporate control thru the use of government force against the people instigated by corporations.
Some examples, maybe not such good ones, but these are just the first couple that popped into my mind:
Big Auto Insurance....Goal? Expand the customer base. How much ya wanna make a bet that behind the scenes they lobbied congress to FORCE everyone who wants to drive to PURCHASE auto insurance? And even for those who can afford to pay for any damages assessed in an accident, making insurance an unneccessary expense, make the tort system results turn out in such a way as to force the fiscally responsible to have to buy insurance also.
Hurricane Shutters? Hmmm, the good ones are really expensive, more expensive than the windows they cover. How to expalnd the customer base? Convince the insurance companies to NOT insure windows that are not protected by hurricane shutters, and simultaneously convince government to pass a law that minimum quality standards must be met on all new construction, i.e. FORCE builders to only purchase the really expensive ones.... Kills two birds with one stone. For homeowners who don't read the fine print the insurance company doesn't have to pay for broken windows not covered by shutters that meet minimum standards, and expands the customer base of the expensive manufacturer via use of government force on minimum quality standards. (Think about that the next time you see people preparing for a hurricane using plywood.....)
How about native plant species nurserymen? Is there only one local nursery that grows them, but has next to no customers, since customers are often looking at esthetics instead of origin? No problem. Convince local government to pass a law to FORCE people to have a minimum number of native plants based on number of square feet of land owned, along with fines and mitigation for non-compliance. Wallah, guaranteed customer base. (Sound ridiculous? FYI, it isn't JUST big business that does this - this example is actually obtained from a real ordinance, something that I exposed publicly, clause subsequently removed.)
And you can go on and on, if you look past the government regulations to WHO stands to benefit financially that is behind the scenes of the regulations.
I'd bet that quite often behind the scenes it is all about gaining market share from competitors, or forcing market share when next to no customer base even exists. And in the front of the scenes you will have politicians and other groups paid off the books to propagandize the reasons why people should be sheeples and go along with the ideas to transfer more money to those behind the scenes.
Yes, big bigness is an enemy, but big smallness is also an enemy. IMO The real enemy are the sheeples. They take the bait without a word of protest, and quite often agree with the propaganda, without thinking about who gains behind the scenes.
The real dispute should be about how to effectively fight back. More regulations just adds to the problem. What needs to be done is to undo the regulations that are strangling us, and to fight back thru the simple use of the concept of "strike".
Note: feel free to swap the words minority with majority in the below. It matters not which word is used - it is the concept that is important.
If the majority think that Monsanto's genetic engineering of seeds is good and you don't. Go on strike. Don't buy seed from them. And don't buy any food produced by those who purchase seed from them. Let the masses hit the Monsanto's of the world in the pocket-book. If there are a minority who want genetically altered seeds that don't reproduce on 2nd planting, let them buy it.
If the majority want to purchase big dairy milk - so be it. But don't force the minority to purchase raw milk from a local producer.
If the majority of people want something, and plunk their own (not someone else's) money down - so be it. Just don't force it on the rest who don't want the same thing.
And more importantly, if the majority of people don't want something and refuse to purchase something, well, that supplier either goes out of businses, or remains small to service the minority who does want it.
IMO, the real enemy is the sheeple who don't realize think that more and more regulations are the source problem. More and more regulations enables the masses becoming corporate slaves (a/k/a FASCISM).
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/lynnw1366%40hotmail.com
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Gil White, 09/04/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Marie McHarry, 09/06/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!, Lynda, 09/06/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Leslie, 09/07/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Lynn Wigglesworth, 09/07/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Leslie, 09/07/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!, Lynn Wigglesworth, 09/07/2009
-
Message not available
- Re: [Homestead] Fall Garden, Leslie, 09/07/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Leslie, 09/07/2009
-
Message not available
- Re: [Homestead] Garden update, EarthNSky, 09/11/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Lynn Wigglesworth, 09/07/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
Marie McHarry, 09/06/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
EarthNSky, 09/06/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!, EarthNSky, 09/06/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!, Lynn Wigglesworth, 09/06/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!,
EarthNSky, 09/06/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Talk about disrespect!, JPitts, 09/06/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.