Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

gmark - Re: Gospel Fiction

gmark AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Kata Markon

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hudson Barton <hhbv AT highwinds.com>
  • To: "Kata Markon" <gmark AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Gospel Fiction
  • Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:43:05 -0500


...that 1 Peter, let alone 2 Peter, is Petrine (that is, as from the disciple Peter) betrays a fundamental lack of acquaintance with what the scholarly consensus is with respect to the date and authorship of these works, and will result in the poster being recognized as being unqualified to post.



I'm trying to figure out what's going on here. A warning comes that all list members must subscribe a particular theory about the authorship of 1 Peter, or risk being kicked off the list when they betray their unorthodox sentiments. Then, lo and behold, list traffic dries up completely. Does the silence indicate what majority opinion is with respect to this orthodoxy? Does it also indicate that the censorship is proving to be successful?


Hudson Barton
Haverford, Pa.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page