gmark AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Kata Markon
List archive
- From: "George Young" <gwyoung AT morgan.ucs.mun.ca>
- To: "Kata Markon" <gmark AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Gospel Creation
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 13:05:09 -0330
Hudson Burton wrote;
> ...Luke and John go to great pains to establish their gospels as factual
> (Luke i.1) and as being "real" (Jn xix.35). They are clearly
> concerned that the gospel(s) might be read as nothing more than myth.
This presumes that a first century audience might 'naturally' have read the
gospel narratives as 'myth.' Do Luke and John betray a covert anxiety to
ward off what the reading conventions of their gospels might naturally
invoke?
G. Young
-
Re: Gospel Creation
, (continued)
- Re: Gospel Creation, JFAlward, 03/15/2001
- Gospel Creation, Steve Black, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Rikki E. Watts, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Jack Kilmon, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Rikki E. Watts, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, George W. Young, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Mark Goodacre, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Jack Kilmon, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Antonio Jerez, 03/16/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Hudson Barton, 03/17/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, George Young, 03/18/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, JFAlward, 03/18/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Antonio Jerez, 03/18/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, George W. Young, 03/18/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 03/18/2001
- Gospel Creation, JFAlward, 03/18/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Hudson Barton, 03/19/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Rikki E. Watts, 03/19/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Rikki E. Watts, 03/19/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, Rikki E. Watts, 03/19/2001
- Re: Gospel Creation, David C. Hindley, 03/19/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.