Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - Re: Colossians Pauline?

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "moon-ryul jung" <moon AT sogang.ac.kr>
  • To: corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
  • Subject: Re: Colossians Pauline?
  • Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 20:55:19 -0400


Daniel wroteL


> IMO, research into the use of amanuenses for the
> composition of ancient letters has all but
> totally invalidated the traditional arguments
> from vocabulary and style, leaving only the
> weak and subjective criterion of "theological
> differences" to determine authenticity.
>

When amanuenses are used to compose letters, are they
supposed to construct sentences rather than
to dictate what they heard?

Moon
Moon R. Jung
Sogang Univ,
Seoul, Korea

> Daniel Streett, student
> Yale Divinity School
> danstreett AT yahoo.com
>
> --- "Frank W. Hughes" <fwhughes AT sunbeach.net> wrote:
> > I don't think Colossians was written by Paul but do think it
> > is an interpretation of Paulinism and that it belongs
> > somewhere in late first century Paulinism.
> > I think the writer of Colossians did not agree with the
> > futurist eschatology of Paul. I think this is the biggest
> > theological difference between Colossians and the authentic
> > letters.
> > Frank W. Hughes
> > Lecturer in New Testament Studies
> > Codrington College
> > St. John
> > Barbados, West Indies
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page