Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

corpus-paul - mixed marriages

corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "John Dickson" <dicksonj AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: mixed marriages
  • Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:19:02 +1000

Dear all,
Rodney Stark (The Rise of Christianity) makes the claim, on social scientific grounds, that marriages between believers and non-beleivers in early Christianity were not uncommon. The point got me thinking again about Paul's brief qualification in 1 Cor 7:39 that the widowed Christian is free to marry MONON EN KURIW. It is traditional - with some notable exceptions - to interpret this as meaning the woman may marry only a Christian man. Can we be confident of this?  I have several questions to which I invite others to respond:
1) Given that there were much easier ways for Paul to have indicated that the woman must marry only a Christian may not Paul have meant "with the Lord's blessing" or "in a way that honours the Lord" or some such thing?
2) The phrase has the ring of a 'ruling' in the church, i.e., one he would have repeated in other churches. Given the probable small size of congregations, would not such a ruling (understood in the 'traditional' sense) be impractical?
3) How likely is it that Paul would have transferred Torah or Pharisaic rulings against mixed-marriages into the context of his new Christian communities, especially in light of his tendency to dismantle boundary markers?
4) Do not the arguments of 1 Cor 7:14-16 provide implicit theological justification for mixed-marriages, since a) the unbelieving partner is hGIASTAI (whatever that means) by the believing one, and b) such a marriage contains mission possibilities?
Looking forward to your comments.
Regards,
John Dickson
Department of Ancient History
Macquarie University
Sydney, Australia



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page