ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: RTP-area local music and culture
List archive
- From: James Hepler <jameshepler AT yahoo.com>
- To: RTP-area local music and culture <ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Mr. Grady, Mr. Glenn, do you guys think that lags
between bands is about the same as it has always been
or have they been getting longer? I feel like they're
longer, but I am a lot older than I used to be so I
just figured it was the curmudgeon gene kicking in.
--- grady <grady AT ibiblio.org> wrote:
> Glenn, I appreciate this big first step you're
> taking, and I hope it
> will work out in your favor. (while we're talking
> about steps to take,
> there was a post in that thread about on-campus
> shows, in which the
> poster implied that under-21s can't get into bars
> where the rock happens
> . . . that's true at the Cave, but I thought you
> were still letting
> over-18s in, right? Might need some outreach there .
> . .)
>
> Although I sympathize with your concern about losing
> business, I'm
> compelled by your scenario, below, to provide a
> counter-scenario:
>
> I go to a show at Local 506. After the first band,
> the smoke is bad
> enough that I go outside to be able to breathe a bit
> before the next
> band (this is a regular occurrence for me and dozens
> of other people,
> btw). While I'm out there, some of us nonsmokers
> start talking about the
> other shows that night, at Nightlight, the Cradle,
> and The Cave, all of
> which are within walking distance, and all of which
> are nonsmoking, and
> we all take off to one of those shows.
>
> Or maybe we skip the part where we come to Local 506
> at all.
>
> Maybe I'm biased, but that seems at least as
> reasonable as your
> theoretical situation. In fact, it happened to me a
> week ago, in the
> sense that I was sitting outside Local 506 talking
> to some friends,
> contemplating going in to see Filthybird, but
> ultimately I decided to
> walk to the Cave instead.
>
> Do you really think that having the ability to smoke
> *inside* Local 506
> is the only factor keeping the smokers from fleeing?
> It seems to me that
> people only come to Local 506, which has a cover
> charge most nights it's
> open, to see bands play. With the exception of
> Reservoir, the other bars
> within walking distance who have bands play are all
> non-smoking (the
> Cave allows smoking in the back, but nonsmokers
> never have to go back
> there unless they want to play pool). So if the
> smokers leave to go see
> another band, they're quite possibly going somewhere
> else nonsmoking.
>
> Or are you saying that your smoking patrons are so
> fickle and/or so
> addicted that they'd rather sit at the Sports Bar
> and smoke & drink,
> instead of seeing the band at your bar? If so, then
> why would they
> bother coming to the 506 and paying the cover charge
> at all?
>
> People are going to go in and out of clubs. One of
> the great things
> about Chapel Hill is that you *can* walk from one
> bar to the next, and
> see many different bands in one night, if you're so
> inclined. I think
> the wise thing to do is to factor that into your
> business model as best
> you can, as I'd argue that setup is a net PLUS for
> everyone involved.
>
> As you yourself stated in another post, one thing
> that really keeps
> attendance down is unpredictable start times. I'd
> add to that "and
> really long-ass lags between bands." In an
> environment where there *are*
> so many other clubs nearby, having predictable
> schedules is pretty
> crucial. Making your club somewhere inviting enough
> that people hang
> around between bands is helpful, too, but I'd argue
> that the music is
> the most inviting thing you have to offer. Making it
> as easy as possible
> for people to see that music, and have a great time
> while doing it, is
> the best way to optimize, *as long as* you're
> charging a cover.
>
> It sounds to me like the bottom-line of your
> argument is this: people
> only buy drinks between bands. If the club is
> nonsmoking, then the
> smokers will go next door and buy drinks there
> between bands, and then
> come back when the next band plays, thus draining
> your profits away.
>
> So here's a solution, since, as you say, the Sports
> Bar apparently isn't
> even open: Buy the Sports Bar. Open it back up. Make
> it a smoking
> establishment. Rake in the profits! ;-)
>
> xo
>
> Ross
>
> local506 AT gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I had so many conversations about this last night
> at the Schooner
> > show, and everyone I countered the 'non-smoking'
> argument then
> > understood the dilemma I face. As I thought was
> understood, if no
> > smoking is allowed in 506, then smokers will be
> forced to exit my
> > business and, perhaps, smoke outside. However,
> they may equally
> > choose to visit one of the other bars within
> walking distance to not
> > only smoke, but also buy their next drink, And
> heck, they may have
> > such a good time, they might not venture back.
> And if the Sports Bar
> > re-opens next door, I'm sure plenty of bands will
> find their potential
> > audience not only not drinking at Local 506, but
> not listening to
> > their band either.
> -- ch-scene: the list that mirrors
> alt.music.chapel-hill --
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/ch-scene
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking
, (continued)
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, Chris Calloway, 08/22/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
ron thigpen, 08/22/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
Chris Rossi, 08/22/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, ron thigpen, 08/22/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
Chris Rossi, 08/22/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, Kevin Slater, 08/22/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, local506, 08/23/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, DJ Golf, 08/23/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, johngreenSF AT gmail.com, 08/27/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
local506, 08/27/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
grady, 08/27/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
James Hepler, 08/27/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
grady, 08/27/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, James Hepler, 08/27/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
grady, 08/27/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
James Hepler, 08/27/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, James Hepler, 08/27/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, will, 08/28/2007
-
Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking,
grady, 08/27/2007
- Re: Local 506 vs. Smoking, Rawls nospam, 08/22/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.