Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-uk - Re: [Cc-uk] Academics are not free either...

cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Cc-uk mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Christian Ahlert <christian.ahlert AT oii.ox.ac.uk>
  • To: David M.Berry <d.berry AT sussex.ac.uk>
  • Cc: cc-uk <cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org>, William.Dutton AT oii.ox.ac.uk
  • Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] Academics are not free either...
  • Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:23:09 +0100

David

Yes, its true almost all universities, I am aware of, have chosen to put into their employment contracts that they own their employees intellectual work. Most, if not all, academics are not aware of this undifferentiated approach to copyright. Isn't it a stunning observation that technically every time an academic publishes something he should seek permission from the university?

It highlights, once again, how strange the law has become. It seems perfectly reasonable to me to start getting academics together to publicly challenge this untenable situation.

Best
--Ch

On 28 Apr 2005, at 18:02, David M.Berry wrote:


Actually this is completely untrue. Academics *technically* do not own the copyright to their own work as they are designated as employee's of the University, as I am sure you are all well aware, therefore the employer owns their intellectual property. The whole situation of academics copyright is little discussed or resolved in the UK and I expect this to be a flashpoint should the Universities decide to capitalise on IP beyond patents. My University, for instance, is very clear that it owns the IPR but has chosen not to enforce it on copyright... yet...

Therefore again *technically* releasing under a CC license without the permission of the employer (i.e. the owner of your academic work, the University) is illegal.

The University's are all now shifting their IPR policy and no doubt this will mean many academic freedoms will be curtailed or certainly challenged by these changes...

See http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/ccf.html

An interesting question is whether this CC license work that has been undertaken by academics within their work-time might have the unfortunate consequence of actually being owned by their respective University.

That would be very ironic.. ;-)

Maybe this a place for CC-UK to start a campaign? As I am sure that most academics do not realise that this is actually the case...

- David




On 28 Apr 2005, at 17:09, Paul Harkins wrote:

Academics can happily use CC licenses for their work because they are salaried. Most songwriters and musicians on the other hand need to make a living from their work.

_______________________________________________
Cc-uk mailing list
Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page