cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM
- From: Francesco Poli <frx AT firenze.linux.it>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 23:52:38 +0100
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:17:59 -0500 drew Roberts wrote:
> This from my post of 10/02:
>
> "I don't yet get why the parallel distribution promoters are so gung
> ho on allowing it where ony the platform maker can apply the DRM. Why
> can't the anti-trp be in there with an exception allowing parallel
> distribution in cases where anyone can apply the DRM but not in cases
> where this is not so?"
[...]
>
> Secondly, I abviously was not expressing myself clearly as I have been
> making this proposal for a good while now but both sides of the back
> and forth just seemes to have picked up on what I was getting at.
>
> In my defense, I even pointed this out in my posts, but still got
> nowhere.
I talked about the same idea in a message I previously sent to this same
list (on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:05:59 +0100), but the only reply was from
Greg London, who ignored that part and commented on another one.
BTW, another message of mine that was left (almost) without replies was
sent to this list on Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:51:16 +0100: it includes my
comments about the rest of the current CC draft (excluding the anti-TPM
clause, I mean).
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpL7tub_Oj4G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution.
, (continued)
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., James Grimmelmann, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Maybe Dual Licensing is the solution., Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Greg London, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Greg London, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/02/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Greg London, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Francesco Poli, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Terry Hancock, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, drew Roberts, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Terry Hancock, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, James Grimmelmann, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Two Part ParDist is same as AntiTPM, Greg London, 12/03/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, Terry Hancock, 12/04/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, Benj. Mako Hill, 12/05/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, drew Roberts, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, Terry Hancock, 12/06/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Fwd: Parallel Distribution and Non-Copyleft Licenses, Benj. Mako Hill, 12/07/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.