Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Saturday 02 December 2006 08:15 pm, drew Roberts wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 07:56 pm, Greg London wrote:
> > https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2006-December/004634.html
> >
> > >Use of DRM on a redistributed CC work is okay ONLY IF:
> > >1) The work is also made available in an unDRMed parallel version, and
> > >2) Everyone is free to apply the DRM.
> > >
> > >I would moderately prefer the straightforward parallel distribution
> > >clause to this one.  I would much prefer this version to a license
> > >without a parallel distribution.  (And I would consider a license
> > >without an anti-DRM clause at all unacceptable.)
> >
> > Now I'm totally confused.
> >
> > >2) Everyone is free to apply the DRM.
> >
> > This can only occur if DRM-Dave gives everyone permission to
> > apply DRM to the content that he provided.
> >
> > If DRM-Dave is willing to do this, then he isn't trying to
> > monopolize his platform,
>
> correct.

Hate to reply to my own post, but perhaps he is. For instance, I think I 
would 
also be cool where Dave only allows the "blessed" to apply DRM to non-Free 
works but allows anyone to apply DRM to Free works.
>
snip
>
> all the best,
>
> drew

once again, all the best,

drew
-- 
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
Sayings (Winner 2006)
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/262954