baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: JP Piers ( drinou ) <f5nlg AT tiscali.fr>
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:22:45 +0000
Download opera 5.0 , or 6.12 it works on slack 7.1 availlable on Opera's web
site other download
le Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:09:57 -0400 (EDT)
sindi keesan <keesan2 AT cyberspace.org> écrit:
> > glibc 2.3 would fill the ramdisk, all by itself.
>
> Meaning about 4M? Even 8M would be acceptible, and a lot more useful than
> groff just to read man files.
>
> > > but it is probably acceptable on a 120M hard drive
> >
> > That is your decision; but, if you insist on installing
> > up-to-date versions of everything, you'll soon overflow
> > 120mb.
>
> I have no intention of installing 'everything' - if I did I would be using
> something like Redhat instead of BL ;) But one of my reasons for learning
> Linux is to be able to run Opera and it seems to need the new library, as
> do quite a few other precompiled programs. (I put someone to the trouble
> of installing Slackware 7.1 from CD with the old library so that someone
> else could compile Kermit specially for use by people who did not upgrade
> their libraries, and they recommended that I upgrade anyway because of
> some security patch). A newer library would also let me use programs from
> later versions of Slackware, such as a Lynx later than 2.3.
>
> I know in theory I could compile my own versions of some of these (not
> Opera) but the newer library will take up a lot less space than a
> compiler. Given a choice between a more useful library and X, I would
> choose the former. I have not yet found any X programs I want to run
> other than Opera. I do try to use the smallest possible tool for the job,
> but sometimes the smallest tool won't do the job.
>
> I will probably attempt a library upgrade before installing X. Wish me
> luck.
>
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Steven
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> BasLinux mailing list
> BasLinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/baslinux
>From ichi AT aggies.org Tue Apr 15 15:53:12 2003
Return-Path: <ichi AT aggies.org>
Delivered-To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from desire.actrix.co.nz (dragon.actrix.co.nz [203.96.16.164])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA85620072
for <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:53:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from senior (203-96-48-156-tollfree.actrix.co.nz [203.96.48.156])
by desire.actrix.co.nz (Postfix) with SMTP id 27AE315433
for <baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:52:52 +1200 (NZST)
Sender: ichi AT actrix.co.nz
Message-ID: <3E9CF759.56A2B571 AT aggies.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:25:29 +0000
From: ichi AT aggies.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.39 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.1030414075855.17505A-100000 AT grex.cyberspace.org>
<Pine.LNX.4.53.0304141420310.1064@homenet>
<001501c3034a$83d2cf40$0a00a8c0@LAPTOP>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [BL] tiny-X segfault
X-BeenThere: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <baslinux.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/baslinux>,
<mailto:baslinux-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/baslinux>
List-Post: <mailto:baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/baslinux>,
<mailto:baslinux-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:53:12 -0000
Ken wrote:
>
> Tiny-X looks good, but I certainly am in no position to
> build it!
To which Steven replied:
>
> The tiny-X package from Jean-Philippe might work.
> ------------------------------
> http://217.109.169.18/download
> ------------------------------
> I think it is a binary package (does not need compiling).
To which Neo Sze Wee replies:
>
> Yes, it is a binary of about 650kbytes. Unfortunately, it
> caused segment fault on my computer.
-
[BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
James Miller, 04/13/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
ichi, 04/14/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
sindi keesan, 04/14/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
ichi, 04/14/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
sindi keesan, 04/15/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, drinou , 04/15/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
ichi, 04/15/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
sindi keesan, 04/15/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, James Miller, 04/15/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, sindi keesan, 04/15/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, James Miller, 04/16/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, qwms-avib, 04/16/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
sindi keesan, 04/15/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, qwms-avib, 04/15/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, sindi keesan, 04/15/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, qwms-avib, 04/16/2003
- Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff, sindi keesan, 04/16/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
sindi keesan, 04/15/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
ichi, 04/14/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
sindi keesan, 04/14/2003
-
Re: [BL] Opera 7.10 beta, graphical browser stuff,
ichi, 04/14/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.