Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] G.Gertoux and the Name...

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Rolf" <rolf.furuli AT sf-nett.no>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] G.Gertoux and the Name...
  • Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:39:52 +0200

Dear list-members,

This thread has brought up many interesting observations and arguments. I
think it is time to draw the lines together. What started the thread was my
words that there is even good evidence that the the tetragram in some form
occurred in the NT autographs. In my posts I have tried to present the case
in an undogmatic way.

EVIDENCE

a) All the fragments of the LXX up to 50 CE have the tetragram or IAO.
b) The LXX manuscripts from the second century CE onward have KS in quotes
from The Tanakh where YHWH is found.

c) We do not possess the NT autographs and do not know whether they contained
YHWH or YAO.

d) The NT manuscripts from the second century CE onward have KS.

Conclusion regarding this evidence: The KS in the LXX manuscripts represent
textual corruption; someone deliberately changed the text from YHWH/IAO to
KS. The KS in the NT manuscripts also represents textual corruption, because
KS was not written in the original NT manuscripts. The pattern of the LXX
(YHWH/IAO ----> KS) suggests, but do not prove, that the NT autographs
contained YHWH or IAO.

ARGUMENTS

a) Exodus 3:15 NIV says regarding YHWH: "This is my name for ever, the name I
am to be remembered from generation to generation." The witness of the whole
Tanakh is that YHWH should be used for ever and not any substitute. (A name
was extremely important for the Jews.)

b) Jesus and the NT writers unanimously say that the Tanakh is the truth of
God and must not be altered. Traditions and customs that are against the
sayings of the Tanakh are condemned. Thus, there is no reason why the NT
writers should not follow Exodus 3:15 and other similar passages, even if
other persons used a substitute for YHWH.

c) The argument in favor of the inclusion of KURIOS in the NT is that the
general custom in the first century CE was to say 'adonay when YHWH was
written. The NT writers followed this custom and used KURIOS in the NT. There
is evidence that in the last two centuries BCE the religious order at Qumran
did not pronounce God's name, but used )L instead. There is no evidence that
different groups in the second or first century BCE used )DNY as a substitute
for YHWH. But there is evidence from the DSS that some who wrote manuscripts
that were imported to Qumran, used YHWH until 70 CE. There is also evidence
in Tosefta that the Pharisees and the Morning-bathers used YHWH in the first
century CE, and there is evidence in the Talmud that the minim (most likely
Christians) used YHWH in the first century CE. There is also much evidence
for a widespread use of IAO from the third century BCE to the second century
CE.

d) The evidence is that YHWH was in use in the days of Jesus, and even if
only )DNY had been used, there is no reason to believe that Jesus would have
violated the Tanakh by using a substitute for YHWH.

FINAL CONCLUSION: Because the oldest extankt NT manuscripts have a corrupt
text—KS was not in the original—we cannot know with certainty how the NT
autographs rendered God's name. But the bulk of the evidence suggests that
YHWH was found in the NT autographs, because, 1) the command of the Tanakh is
that the YHWH should be used for ever, 2) Jesus and the NT writers did not
follow the traditions of men, 3) when the NT writers quoted the Tanakh where
the name occurs, there was no reason why they should not use YHWH in their
quoted texts, and 4) the text of the LXX was tampered with, and God's name
was removed from it between 50 and 130 CE. The same substitute, KS; is found
in the NT and LXX manuscripts from the second century, and this suggests that
the NT was tampered with in the same way as the LXX was—YHWH was removed and
KS was used as a substitute.




Best regards,



Rolf Furuli
Stavern
Norway




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page